Infrastructure Spending in the Characteristics of the Regions: Towards the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract
Abstract: Indonesia is faced with challenges by the increasing infrastructure competitiveness globally. In 2019, Indonesia's competitiveness rank declined to 72nd from 141 countries compared to the previous year (World Economic Forum, 2019). Another challenge is also depicted in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 9 dealing with the infrastructure as shown at two indicators that still require special attention. So far, the gaps in infrastructure development still exist in Indonesia after seeing the region's characteristics. The government also supports infrastructure development with a fiscal decentralization system through the Balancing Fund instrument. This study is aimed to analyze the effect of Owned-Source Revenues (OSR) and Balancing Fund Income on infrastructure development in Indonesia by considering infrastructure mandatory spending and aspects of regional characteristics comprise institutional status, geographical conditions, and economic structure. This study uses four-panel data regression modeling and the Generalised Method of Moment (GMM) method for analysis. The results showed that government intervention in mandatory infrastructure spending could moderate the influence of OSR and Balancing Fund income on infrastructure development. In testing based on regional characteristics, the impact of OSR and Specific Grant (Dana Alokasi Khusus/DAK) on infrastructure development is higher. It has a positive value in regions with better financial independence (urban, Java-Sumatra, and metropolitan). Otherwise, the influence of Block Grant (Dana Alokasi Umum/DAU) and Shared Nontax Revenues (Dana Bagi Hasil/DBH) on infrastructure development is stronger. It has a significant positive value in regions with a lower financial independence category (district, non-Java-Sumatra, and non-metropolitan). This research also provides novelty in an analysis of mandatory spending on infrastructure. The central government can use the results of this study to make priorities or maximize the potential of Subnational Governments (SNGs) in infrastructure development, and the ultimate goal is the achievement of the Infrastructure SDGs in Indonesia.
Keywords: Infrastructure, Fiscal Decentralization, Regional Characteristics, GMM
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalia, N. dan Haryanto. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum, dan Belanja Modal terhadap Tingkat Kemandirian Keuangan Daerah OSRa Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2012-2017. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. Volume 8, Nomor 2, Halaman 1, ISSN (Online): 2337-3806. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
Amir, Hidayat dan Tenrini, Rita Helbra. (2013). Mandatory Spending dan Rigiditas Fiskal.Jakarta:Badan Kebijakan Fiskal.Warta Fiskal
Andriana, N. 2020. Pengaruh Dana Perimbangan dan Belanja Modal terhadap Kemandirian Daerah. Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara Vol.2, No.1, Hal.105-113. Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
Aritenang, A. F. (2019). The Effect of Intergovernmental Transfers on Infrastructure Spending in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1675352
Bailey, Stephen J. (1999). SNGs Economics Principles and Practice. Macmillan Press Ltd. https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Local-Government-Economics/?K=9780333669082
Baldwin, J. R., and Dixon, J. (2008). Infrastructure Capital: What is it? Where is it? How much of it is there? Canadian Productivity Review. No 16. Ottawa: Statistics Canada
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). (2020). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelaksanaan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan/ Sustainable Development Goals (TPB/SDGs) Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kedeputian Bidang Kemaritiman dan Sumber Daya Alam, Bappenas
Caraka, R. E. dan Yasin H. (2017). Spatial Data Panel. Cetakan Pertama, Desember 2017. ISBN: 978-602-5498-14-5. penerbit: Wade Group
Dettman, S., and T. Pepinsky. (2014). Resource Shocks and Local Public Goods: A Tale of Two Districts. Paper prepared for the 2014 Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, Washington, DC.
Ekananda, Mahyus. (2016). Analisis Ekonometrika Data Panel-Teori Lengkap dan Pembahasan Menyeluruh bagi Penelitian Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Sosial. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media
Fitriandari, M. (2018). Penerapan Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) OSRa Persamaan Simultan Durbin Spasial untuk Pemodelan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara ASEAN. Departemen Statistika Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November
Ghozali, Imam. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Dipenogoro
Gujarati, Damodar N., and Dawn C. Porter. (2009). Basic Econometrics. Fifth Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hastuti, Proborini. (2018). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Stabilitas Politik dalam Kerangka Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. UPN Veteran. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara (SNKN)
Hayek, F.A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge In Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), pp: 519-530. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809376?seq=1
Lestari, A., dkk. (2016). Pengaruh Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU) dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (OSR) terhadap Belanja Modal dan Kemandirian Keuangan Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Progres Ekonomi Pembangunan. Volume 1, Nomor 2, e-ISSN: 2502-5171
Lewis, B. (2013). SNGs Capital Spending in Indonesia: Impact of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Public Budgeting and Finance, 33(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12002.x
Oates, W.E. (1993). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Development. National Tax Journal 46. https://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/46/2/ntj-v46n02p237-43-fiscal-decentralization-economic-development.pdf
Palei, Tatyana. (2015). Assessing The Impact of Infrastructure on Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance 23, 168 – 175. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00322-6
Payne, J. E. (1997). The Tax-Spend Debate: The Case of Canada. Applied Economics Letters, 4(6), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048597355357
Payne, J. E. (1998). The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from State Budgets. Public Choice, 95(3–4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004906125307
Payne, J. E. (2003). A Survey of the International Empirical Evidence on the Tax-Spend Debate. Public Finance Review, 31(3), 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142103031003005
Schulze, G. G., and B. S. Sjahrir. (2014). Decentralization, Governance, and Public Service Delivery in Hal Hill, Regional Dynamics in a Decentralised Indonesia. Indonesia Update Series, Singapore: ISEAS.
Schwab, Klaus. (2017). Insight Report-The Global Competitiveness Report 2017. Switzerland: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf
Schwab, Klaus. (2018). Insight Report-The Global Competitiveness Report 2017. Switzerland: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf
Schwab, Klaus. (2019). Insight Report-The Global Competitiveness Report 2017. Switzerland: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Sekaran, Uma. dan Bougie, Roger. (2017). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis-Pendekatan Pengembangan Keahlian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Shadmanov, Shukhrat. (2015). Infrastructure and Economic Growth. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Research (IJECR), ISSN(P): 2250-0006; ISSN(E): 2319-4472. Vol. 5, Issue 1, Feb 2015, 9-16, © TJPRC Pvt. Ltd. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274889672
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhardjanto, D dan Sri Hartoko, S. (2009). The Influence Of Fiscal Decentralisation On The Public Expenditure In Indonesia. Siasat Bisnis, 13(3), 233–252. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2389819449/1AF5EFF8C01042A5PQ/9?accountid=37509
Wibowo, Puji. (2008) Mencermati Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah. Jurnal Keuangan Publik, Vol. 5, No. 1, hal 55-83.
Young, A. T. (2009). Tax-Spend or Fiscal Illusion. Cato Journal, 29. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/catoj29&id=475&div=&collection=
DOI: http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.622
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research (IJAR)
Editorial SecretariatMaster of Science and Doctoral Programs
Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University
Jl. Nusantara, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta 55281
CP : Novita
Phone : +62 812-2848-2829
Fax : +62 274 524606
Website: http://ijar-iaikapd.or.id/
Email : sekretariat@ijar-iaikapd.or.id
Marketing and Sales Office
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia
Graha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1 Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 10310
CP : Reza Fauzi
Divisi Pelayanan, Keanggotaan dan Mitra IAI.
Grha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1, Menteng.
Telp.021-31904232 Ext.324/321
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISSN 2086-6887 (Print)ISSN 2655 - 1748 (online)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------