Analysis of Factors that Affecting Cost Consciousness in Non-Profit Organizations
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of formal authority structure, accounting information system characteristics, work motivation and informal authority structure to cost consciousness mediated by manager behavior in decision control and decision management. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the development of theory, especially the theory of accounting behavior and add to managerial practices in improving the effectiveness and cost efficiency through the behavior of care costs. The research data is taken from non-profit organizations that provide educational services. Questionnaires were distributed to middle managers and structural officials in educational institutions. There are 250 questionnaires sent to respondents with a response rate of 62.8 percent. The analysis was done by using a two-step approach from SEM technique with Amos. The results show that formal authority structure has a positive effect on manager behavior in decision control and decision management. Characteristics of accounting information systems have a positive effect on manager behavior in decision control and decision management. Work motivation has no effect on manager behavior in decision control and decision management. The structure of informal authority has a positive effect on manager behavior in decision-making and decision management. Decision control and decision management have a positive effect on cost consciousness. The formal structure of authority and the structure of informal authorities have proven not to affect cost consciousness.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh struktur kewenangan formal, karakteristik sistem informasi akuntansi, motivasi kerja dan struktur kewenangan informal terhadap kepedulian biaya yang dimediasi oleh perilaku manajer dalam pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberi kontribusi untuk pengembangan teori, khususnya teori akuntansi keperilakuan dan memberi kontribusi terhadap praktik manajerial dalam meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi biaya melalui perilaku peduli biaya. Data penelitian ini diambil dari organisasi nirlaba yang menyediakan layanan pendidikan. Kuesioner dibagikan kepada manajer menengah dan pejabat struktural di institusi pendidikan. Ada 250 kuesioner yang dikirim kepada responden dengan tingkat respon 62,8 persen. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan two step approach dari teknik SEM dengan Amos. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa struktur kewenangan formal berpengaruh positif terhadap perilaku manajer dalam pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan. Karakteristik sistem informasi akuntansi berpengaruh positif terhadap perilaku manajer dalam pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan. Motivasi kerja tidak berpengaruh terhadap perilaku manajer dalam pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan. Struktur kewenangan informal berpengaruh positif terhadap perilaku manajer dalam pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan. Pengendalian keputusan dan manajemen keputusan terbukti berpengaruh positif terhadap kepedulian biaya. Struktur kewenangan formal dan struktur kewenangan informal terbukti tidak berpengaruh terhadap kepedulian biaya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abernethy, M.A., A.M. Lillis, P. Brownell and Carter (2001). Product Diversity and Costing System Design Choice: Field Study Evidence. Management Accounting Research, 12(3), 261–279.
______, and Emidia Vagnoni (2004). Power, Organization Design and Managerial Behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 207-225.
______, and J. U. Stoelwinder (1995). The Role of Professional Control in the Management of Complex Organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (1), 1–17.
______, and W.F. Chua (1996). A Field Study of Control System Redesign: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1, 596-606.
Alexander, J.A. and L. L. Morlock (2000). Power and Politics in Health Services Organizations in Health Care Management. Organization Design and Behavior. 4th Edition. Albany.
Ang, J, and S. Koh (1997). Exploring the Relationship Between User Information Satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management 17 (3), pp. 169-177.
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Birnberg, J.G., M.D. Shields and S.M. Young (1990). The Case for Multiple Methods in Empirical Management Accounting Research (with an illustration from budget setting). Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2, 33-66.
Bowens, J. and M. A. Abernethy (2000). The Consequences of Customization of Management Accounting System Design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24 (2), 221–241.
Chenhall, Robert H. and Deigan Morris (1986). The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. The Accounting Review Vol. 61, No. 1 pp. 16-35.
Comrey, A. L. and H. B. Lee (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March (1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Second edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Doll, W.J. and G. Torkzadeh (1988). The Measurement of End User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12 (2), 259-274.
Gibson, J.I., J.M. Ivancevich and J. H. Donelly (2000). Perilaku Organisasi: Struktur dan Proses. Edisi Kedelapan. Jakarta: Bina Rupa Aksara.
Hardy, C. and S.R. Clegg (1999). Some Dare Call it Power in Govindarajan, V. (1988) A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business.
Hasibuan, H. dan S.P. Malayu (1996). Organisasi dan Motivasi, Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas. Bandung: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
Hair, J.F. Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L.Tatham and W.C. Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling (1992). Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. In L. Werin, & H. Wijkander. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 05-360.
Kotter, J. P. (1985). Power and Influence: Beyond Formal Authority. New York: Free Press.
Kren, L. (1997). The Role of Accounting Information in Organizational Control: The State of the Art. In V. Arnold, and S. G. Sutton, Behavioral Accounting Research, Foundations and Frontiers. American Accounting Association: USA.
McHanney, R. and T.P. Cronan (1998). Computer Simulation Success: On the Use of End-User Satisfaction Instrument. Decision Science, 29 (2), 525-536.
Mia, L, and N.Z. Miah (1996). Decentralization, Accounting Control and Performant of Government Organization: A New Zealand Empirical Study. Financial Accounting and Management, 12 (3), Agust, pp 173-189
Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992). Economics, Organizations, and Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
Perrow (1986). Complex Organization: A Critical Essay, New York: Random House
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2003. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Sajady, H. and M. Dastgir. (2008). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Accounting Information Systems. International Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.6.
Scott, William R. (2000). Financial Accounting Theory. Second Edition. Canada: Prentice Hall.
Shields, M., and S. M. Young (1994). Managing Innovation Costs: A Study of Cost-Conscious Behavior by R&D Professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6, 175–196.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral View. Santa Monica: Goodyear.
Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics, Volume 1. Third edition. HarperCollins College Publishers.
Wruck, K. H. and M. C. Jensen (1994. Science, Specific Knowledge, and Total Quality Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18 (1994) 247 - 287.
Zimmerman, J. (1997). Accounting for Decision Making and Control. Boston: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.351
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research (IJAR)
Editorial SecretariatMaster of Science and Doctoral Programs
Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University
Jl. Nusantara, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta 55281
CP : Novita
Phone : +62 812-2848-2829
Fax : +62 274 524606
Website: http://ijar-iaikapd.or.id/
Email : sekretariat@ijar-iaikapd.or.id
Marketing and Sales Office
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia
Graha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1 Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 10310
CP : Reza Fauzi
Divisi Pelayanan, Keanggotaan dan Mitra IAI.
Grha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1, Menteng.
Telp.021-31904232 Ext.324/321
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISSN 2086-6887 (Print)ISSN 2655 - 1748 (online)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------